Escrito por: Alejandro Fernández Publicado: 28/08/2025
AI has moved beyond generating outputs like text or images to systems that can act toward goals and complete tasks.
In this shift, two terms are often confused: Agentic AI and AI Agents.
Both are rooted in goal-directed behavior, but one defines the paradigm, while the other is its practical manifestation.
Agentic AI is an architectural approach for building systems that can pursue goals, orchestrate multiple capabilities, and adapt to changing environments. It is the broader concept that makes AI Agents possible, but it is not limited to them.
Agentic AI is best understood through its defining qualities at the system level:
Agentic AI is not tied to language models or software alone. It shows up in robotics, industrial automation, and other systems where machines reason and act toward goals.
Autonomous Vehicles: A self-driving system continuously sets micro-goals such as staying in lane, yielding, or rerouting around obstacles. It uses sensors and maps to plan its trajectory and executes control commands to drive. This is a clear expression of agentic reasoning, but it is not an AI Agent in the user-facing, software-product sense.
AI Agents are concrete software systems built on agentic principles that users can directly interact with. They take a user’s goal, often expressed in natural language, and carry out the necessary steps to complete it. Most are powered by large language models (LLMs) enhanced with tools, APIs, and memory.
AI Agents can be understood through three key qualities:
While Agentic AI describes the architecture, AI Agents are its user-facing implementations. They are productized systems, typically designed to automate specific workflows or business processes.
The distinction lies not in capability but in framing: Agentic AI as the broader design principle, AI Agents as systems built on it.
Dimension | Agentic AI | AI Agents |
---|---|---|
Nature | Architectural approach for building goal-driven systems | Concrete, productized software that users interact with |
Scope | Broad design paradigm for orchestrating reasoning, planning, and action | Executes specific user goals end-to-end within a defined context |
Reasoning core | May or may not rely on large language models. | Typically centered on LLMs with reasoning, planning, and decision-making |
Tool use & integrations | Supports any tools, sensors, or actuators. Physical or digital | Connects to APIs, databases, and business applications |
User interface | No need for direct user interface, can be embedded into systems or machines | Often exposed through natural language, chat, or application surfaces |
Examples | Autonomous vehicles, factory robotics, industrial automation | Travel-booking agent, invoice processing agent, customer support agent |
Agentic AI and AI Agents are closely linked, and the line between them will keep narrowing. AI Agents already depend on the principles of Agentic AI, and more systems across industries will continue adopting agentic capabilities as they evolve.
The key takeaway is simple: Agentic AI is the idea. AI Agents are the application. One defines the architecture that makes goal-directed systems possible, the other is how those ideas reach end users in concrete, task-driven products.